This is the speak you need to know when talking DOCSIS 3.0 to any DOCSIS Engineer or specialist. It is important that you learn the full name, in many cases the acronym and also what value the particular terminology plays in a DOCSIS 3.0 network as it will likely be crucial in troubleshooting tough-to-diagnose DOCSIS impairments.
Downstream Channel Bonding is perhaps the ball bearings of DOCSIS 3.0, enabling subscriber data speeds in excess of 160 Mbps (4 times that of previous DOCSIS versions). While conceptually simple, the principle of combining multiple downstream DOCSIS channels together to carry the same user data must have tight constraints in order to preserve the integrity of the data and have the data arrive at the correct subscriber’s device and in sequence. This article will cover both the physical layer aspects and DOCSIS protocol aspects that enable channel bonding.
In my article on DOCSIS 3.0 M-CMTS architecture, I talked about the distributed nature of the CMTS with an M-CMTS core (the CPU of the system), a DOCSIS Timing Server, and an edge Quadrature Amplitude Modulator (EQAM). I am going to cover the EQAM in detail in this article because in the past couple of years, EQAM (also spelled eQAM) has rapidly become part of our vocabulary but its operation and value often go unappreciated. Further, in order to fully understand DOCSIS 3.0 operation, downstream channel bonding, and possible issue which may arise, a thorough understanding of the eQAM is critical.
Before we dive into bits, bytes and protocol, first we will discus some hardware. During the evolution of DOCSIS 3.0 there were a number of interesting interim steps along the way, shall we say building blocks, to arrive at a full blown D3.0 CMTSs. This left us with two fundamentally different system architectures in production by CMTS vendors, Integrated and Modular CMTSs. It is important to understand these “architectures” from a purchasing, operational and deployment standpoint as they have different requirements in some cases, some are better than others depending on the system layout.
bradyvolpe.com is Stephen Fry proof thanks to caching by WP Super Cache
